TFF • Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg

Share this post

Reuters remains silent on its deficient NATO military expenditure reporting

thetransnational.substack.com

Discover more from TFF • Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg

For a global future that respects the UN norm that peace shall be established by peaceful means. Research-based public education and policy proposals continuously since 1986
Continue reading
Sign in

Reuters remains silent on its deficient NATO military expenditure reporting

Mainstream media people no longer respond to any letters one sends to them

TFF & Jan Oberg & Others
May 27, 2023
3
Share this post

Reuters remains silent on its deficient NATO military expenditure reporting

thetransnational.substack.com
1
Share

Jan Oberg

Reuters’ senior correspondent for European security and diplomacy, Andrew Gray (and colleague Sabine Siebold), wrote a piece on March 21, 2023, on “NATO chief urges members to boost defence spending as only 7 hit target.”

Please read it and then my email to Gray of May 15, 2023:

Thanks for reading TFF • Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

“Dear Andrew Gray

Has it ever been discussed among your professional colleagues whether it makes sense to tie military expenditures to GDP?

Perhaps it is a kind of meta question, but in my view, that measure indicates a combination of intellectual disarmament coupled with military re-armament.

Why?

The only intellectual and moral indicator is to tie a country’s military expenditures to a comprehensive analysis of what threatens that country in military and civilian sectors and terms. It borders on the absurd that, if a country has a really impressive economic growth performance, it should also – therefore and automatically – increase its military expenditures. And vice versa.

It seems parallel to stating that you and I ought to spend a certain percentage of our incomes on medicine – whether or not we have some diseases.

In addition, if I may – is it perhaps because of sheer lack of knowledge that in articles like yours, it is never mentioned that NATO’s 31/32 countries spend at least 12 times more than Russia – according to esteemed institutes like SIPRI in Stockholm – which is the alliance’s main defined adversary and that, if Mr Stoltenberg’s appeals to the member states bear fruit, Russia’s expenditures will fall to about 2-3% of NATO’s combined spending?

A conflict and peace researcher such as I tend to see two parties (as a minimum) to define a conflict. Thus, from a simple public information viewpoint that I assume Reuters find essential, it might be both more professional and fair to state the obvious, namely both parties military spending and not only that of one side. I mean, we’d find it strange, if not comical, to report a football match by telling only how one of the teams play.

I look forward to your thoughts on this, and – sure – criticism of my argument.

Sincerely,

Jan Oberg, PhD, research director

transnational.live”

Over the last few years, I have written personal letters to individual e-addresses like the above to over 40 internationally respected mainstream media journalists and editors at CNN, BBC, Reuters, Guardian, etc., on several different issues. No personal attacks, of course, but questions, perspectives, concepts and source criticism – or pointing to omitted aspects.

I assume that there must be a coordinated media political strategy because, frankly, I’ve never – not in a single case – received a reply.

This text was originally published at Jan Oberg’s online home and blog.

Thanks for reading TFF • Transnational Foundation & Jan Oberg! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

3
Share this post

Reuters remains silent on its deficient NATO military expenditure reporting

thetransnational.substack.com
1
Share
Previous
Next
1 Comment
Share this discussion

Reuters remains silent on its deficient NATO military expenditure reporting

thetransnational.substack.com
Nick
May 28

So true. These days, you need to read between lines, just like the Russians did during the Soviet era, when scrutinizing PRAVDA and interpreting the propaganda, to get an inkling of what is really happening.

I experienced a case of this the other day. While looking for stats on crime in El Salvador, I found this article https://insightcrime.org/news/insight-crime-2022-homicide-round-up/

It probably is harsh what's going on in that country. But it puzzled me that the tone was so negative. The murder rate could be below Canada by now, and perhaps the lowest in both North America, Central America, and South America? Could it be because El Salvador has turned to Bitcoin, and this doesn't jive with certain interests?

Another interesting thing I was made aware of by Ivor Cummins (https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/) is that the coldest year the past 8'000 years was around 1870, according to ice core samples, which very precisely report the fluctuations in temperature. If this is true, then it would make sense that it's currently getting warmer. It's the natural thing that's happening, since it can't very well get any colder.

"The BEST Climate Clip I've EVER seen"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmmmgiPha_Y

ORIGINAL: "We Live in Cold Times"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WE0zHZPQJzA

What remains to be determined is whether humans are behind 0.1% of the changes, 99.9%, or somewhere in between.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 TFF & Jan Oberg & Others
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing